African, Africans and the Bible

I began writing this essay in response a young woman who said to me that Black folks were blessed to come to America as slaves, and that God brought us here so we would find Jesus and Christianity.  Mind you this was an intelligent albeit Europeanized black woman and she was not the first to come up with this silly notion, I’d heard this tired message all my religious life from the pulpits all over this country. Around Black History month when we have some semblance of the full capacity of a united cause and a brief lesson in a portion of our history, we get a bucket of cold chilly  ‘You ain’t nothin’ and we were always heathens, that’s why he allowed the white-man to enslave us and bring us here…now ain’t we blessed’! Each time anyone said this, I would become incensed.

My final straw was her comments and I decided to dedicate this essay to her and all of our people who have not come out of the glare of blinding ignorance. 

We have been educated to be ignorant”

Ekowa Kenyatta

Slave ships of 1905

Yes, after the law prohibiting slavery!!!!

A men-stealers/kidnappers reward is cited in Exodus 21:16

"Anyone who kidnaps another and either sells him or still has him when he is caught must be put to death.”

And to all those who considered themselves Jews in America and their ancestors bought, sold, transported, held or profited in slaves violated Torah. All whos ancestors considered themselves Christians and believed in ‘Replacement Theology’ or a messianic hope in Jesus by way of Israel and that they are the New Israelites under the covenant of Jesus because  the Jew lost his Biblical position in the Kingdom, and stood by to watch, participate, transport, keep silent, own slave Africans are also in violation of the bible and deserve death.

Deuteronomy 24:7

“If a man is caught kidnapping one of his brother Israelites and treats him as a slave or sells him, the kidnapper must die. You must purge the evil from among you.”

That should have put an end to the discussion, but it hasn’t because most black folks do not believe they are part of the biblical landscape and most European Christians and Jews don’t believe a black man was included in their sacred books.  For all e Bible believer [for you Moslems I have another essay] that can not understand all roads of religion lead to Egypt , I will start with the words of he biblical writers so we can see where we fit.  

Quote: 

"In conclusion, color prejudice seems to have developed in the first century A. D. as a phase of the struggle among Christianity, Judaism, and Paganism. Furthermore, the French anthropologist, Topinard believes the Rabbis of the fifth century were the first to stress differences of race and color. The historical record asserts that he is correct.

Topinard states, "In the first century when Christianity was beginning to establish itself in Rome the doctrine of a separate creation for whites and Africans was defended by the Babylonian Rabbis and later by Emperor Julian. In 415 A. D. when one council was debating whether the Ethiopians/Africans were descended from Adam and the theory they were not was making considerable progress, St. Augustine in his "City of God" interjected and declared that no true Christian would doubt that all men, of no matter what form, color, or height were of the same protoplasmic origin." Before Color Prejudice, By Frank M. Snowden (Cambridge University Press, 1984)

 

Praise Ye the Lord!

We give you Praise!

 

Let us look at the beginning of the Hebrew story.

“And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from there it was parted, and became four heads.  The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasses the whole land of Havilah [son of Cush ], where there is gold; and the gold of that land is good; there is bdellium and the onyx stone. And the name of the second river is Gihon [Nile] the same that encompasses the whole land of Ethiopia [ Africa ]. The third river is the Hiddekel; that is which goes toward [not in Assyria, but toward] the east of Assyria . And the fourth is the Euphrates [Nimrod]. Genesis 2:10-14.

This as we know is the basic location of the area called Eden or Paradise .  As we can see, two of the locations encompassed the lands of Africa .  The third went toward Assyria and the forth was the land of what is now known as Babylon .  Each of these areas was the homes of the children of Adam who were black and later re-inhabited by the sons of Noah who were black.  The Rivers as you can see encompass a large part of the African continent. This description is in the second chapter of the book known as Genesis or the Hebrew word Bereshit meaning the beginning, source, cause or origin.

The location of Eden and the garden where the first man and woman was created in Africa . This is a critical piece of information supplied to us in the first chapter of the ‘Book of Beginnings’ which is called Genesis shows us that the River went out of EDEN and from it became [branched off into] 4 rivers. Ancient maps showed that this River encompassed all of Africa and spring from the center of Africa, which is now the modern Uganda .  This is interesting because before the Jews were resettled in Israel in 1945, Uganda was considered as the new Zion and a refuge for the Holocaust victims of Germany .   

Let’s look at the scripture again:

“And a River went out of Eden to water the garden; and from there it was parted, and became four heads.” 

What were the four heads of this great River?

“A river rises in Eden to water the garden; beyond there it divides and becomes four branches. The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasses the whole land of Havilah [son of Cush ], where there is gold; and the gold of that land is good; there is bdellium and the onyx stone. And the name of the second river is Gihon [Nile] the same that encompasses the whole land of Ethiopia [ Africa ]. The third river is the Hiddekel; that is which goes toward [not in Assyria, but toward] the east of Assyria . And the fourth is the Euphrates [Nimrod].”  Genesis 2:10-14.

The first river is the Pison: that is it which compasses the whole land of Havilah [son of Cush ], where there is gold; and the gold of that land is good; there is bdellium and the onyx stone.

Who was Havilah?

“Saba (A.V., Sheba ) of the Book of Kings, whose Queen visited Solomon, while the second is near Edom or, as Glaser suggests, north of Medina . In v. 28 of the same Genesiac chapter, Saba is said to be a son of Jectan (A.V., Joktan), and so Elmodad, Asarmoth, Hevila, Ophir (A.V., Almodad, Hazarmaveth, Havilah, while in chapter xxv, 3, both Saba and Dadan are represented as grandsons of Abraham.” Catholic Encyclopedia

Scholars say the Pison is the Ganges of India. If that is true the Pison region was still in geographical Africa and concerns geographical Africans. The original Indians or Dravidians were an offshoot of the Ethiopians of eastern Africa .  Remember, the term Ethiopian was used for all of Africa by the revisionists of the Bible and that no matter were you live you are considered an Ethiopian or Africa .

Leopold Sedar Sengkor (President of Senegal) (Lecture delivered in Madras under the auspices of the International Institute of Tamil Studies on the 23rd May, 1974)

“Southern India is in the same latitude as Senegal , Mali , Niger , Chad , Sudan , Ethiopia and Somalia . More than this, only the Indian Ocean separates the eastern coast of Africa from the south of India . As a matter of fact, geologists maintain that the Indian sub continent was formerly attached to East Africa . In this respect the findings of marine biology are of outstanding importance.”

During my last visit to Addis Ababa , I was very much impressed with the large number of Ethiopians who, with their fine features, black skin and straight hair, look like Dravidians.  I mentioned this to the Emperor who, with a knowing air, merely smiled a royal smile.

 Notes: (Loga). In Tamil there is a term ‘maRavar, maaRan’ etc a name of a group of Tamils especially in Pandiya country. It is interesting that the root ‘maRu’ also means black ).  http://arutkural.tripod.com/tolcampus/drav-african.htm

Example: If you had a sister that moved to Chicago , would she still not be you sister?  She is just in a different location but your blood is the same.  She may even develop different traditions base on the root of you family and pass these modified traditions onto her children.

Here is an excerpt of the Indian holy book about the Genesis account.

“At last, after crossing that wide river the Pison, he came to the Brahmans.”

What are Brahmins and where do they reside?

“The priests of Hindu temples are also from this caste.  In India , in ancient times they also served as spiritual advisors of Kshatriya Kings.”

India is host of several different people among them, the most in number and lowest in caste and most maligned is the Dravidian.  The Dravidians are the oldest people to inhabit India and were subjugated by the Aryans and the Brahmins.

“The term arose from assumptions by nineteenth century Western scholars that Dravidian speakers were earlier inhabitants of India than the speakers of the Indo-Aryan languages in the north of the country. It was supposed that the generally darker-skinned Dravidians constituted a distinct race. This notion corresponded to racial hierarchies of the time according to which darker skinned peoples were more primitive than light-skinned whites. Accordingly, Dravidians were envisaged as primitive early inhabitants of India who had been partially displaced and subordinated by more advanced Aryans. The term Dravidian is taken from the Sanskrit "drāvida", meaning "Southern".

According to Herodotus and Homer, ancient historians:

“Herodotus, Homer and other Greek authors called the Dravidians the Eastern Ethiopians or Eastern Ethiopians. Greek writers sometimes identified the Ethiopians of Egypt with the Eastern Ethiopians. Also the Egyptian and Indian geography were sometimes compared or identified with one another.”

Herodotus wrote about the Dravidians:

“They differed in nothing from the other Ethiopians, save in their language, and the character of their hair. For the Eastern Ethiopians have straight hair, while they of Libya [ Africa ] are more woolly-haired than any other people in the world.” (Herodotus: The History of the Persian Wars, VII.70., c.430 BCE).

Again, here is another account of the story:

“During my last visit to Addis Ababa , I was very much impressed with the large number of Ethiopians who, with their fine features, black skin and straight hair, look like Dravidians.  I mentioned this to the Emperor who, with a knowing air, merely smiled a royal smile.”

Libya was another word for Africa . There are many names for Africa and the people who lived there. Kemet, Kam , Ethiopia , Sudan [black], Sahara, Megreb, Kush or Cush [sometimes Kish or Tish] to name a few.  Here are some Greek terms that refer to black folks: Aethiops, melas, melanochoros, Niger , ater, aquilus, exustus, furvus, fuscus, percotus and Phineas [dark-skinned oracle]. Read my essays What’s in a Name and the Name Game for more info

Remember, the famous New Testament duo Pricilla and Aquila ? 

And finding a certain Jew, named Aquila [black], born in Pontus , lately come from Italy , with Priscilla his wife (because that Claudius had commanded all Jews to depart from Rome ), he came to them.

The term Aquilus was another name for swarthy or black.  William Shakespeare in his play the merchant of Venice the character shylock was a swarthy Jew. Shakespeare knew that even the medieval Jews were African in origin.

"The Moors were," according to the Oxford English Dictionary, "commonly supposed to be mostly black or very swarthy, and hence the word is often used for Negro."

Swarthy - KEIR: Gaelic name meaning "dark-skinned, swarthy."        

Priscilla is also an interesting her name was a derivative of Quinta, Secunda, Livia and Drusa.

Additional Roman terms were: Additional Greco-Roman ethnonyms of Blacks: Afer (African), Indus/Indi ( India ),Maurus (Moor).

Just as the term colored, black, and now African-American is currently used to label those of us of African extraction that reside in America . There were different terms employed for the African by those who wrote history.  We must note that what the African called himself was different than what those outside of the family called him.  Africans looked at all other Africans as brothers and sisters, and did not use color to differentiate him from his larger family.  As a note: there is not a word for cousin in any African language. You are either a brother or sister.

“The distinction between the black-skinned Sudroid [Sudanese] races of southern India and the fair-skinned Aryan [invaders] races of northern India is not an invention of English colonialist historians; it is a feature mentioned by the earliest Greek travelers who visited south Asia centuries before the advent of Robert Clive.

The ancient Greeks considered the Africans and Sudras (modern Dalits and Dravidians) as belonging to the same `Ethiopian' stock. `Ethiopian' was the Greek word for `Negro', and Greek authors referred to the African Negroes as `Western Ethiopians' and to the Sudroids as `Eastern Ethiopians' (ie. Eastern Negroes) [ cf. Herodotus.VI.70 ].

Remember, before the separation of the land masses India was attached to Africa on the east as South America was attached to Africa on the west.

There were eight different Biblical terms for black: Eight different words have been translated "black." They indicate various meanings such as "dusky like the early dawn," "ashen," "swarthy," "moved with passion".  The Hebrew word meaning "sunburnt" or "swarthy" is translated "black" in the Revised Version of the American and British Bibles.

O we see the first river is where Africans have always lived. Now for all you biblical scholars that believe that there were not people living in and around Eden , I will leave that to your studies; suffice it to say Eden was in Africa .

The second river:

“And the name of the second river is Gihon [Nile] the same that encompasses the whole land of Ethiopia [ Africa ].”  

That needs no explanation, but just in case, we see that the Hebrew word for the Nile was the Gihon and the land of Ethiopia was another word for what is known as Africa . The river encompassed the whole land of Ethiopia/Africa.

“The Egyptians believed their gods [neteru] came from the mountainous country to the south, and they called it Punt or the Land of the Gods. The Greeks named it Ethiopia or the Land of Burnt Faces .”

The third river is the Hiddekel; that is which goes toward [not in Assyria, but toward] the east of Assyria .

“Geographically, Assyria occupies the northern and middle part of Mesopotamia, situated between the rivers Euphrates and Tigris; while the southern half, extending as far south as the Persian Gulf, constitutes the countries of Babylonia and Chaldea .”

What and where is Assyria ? Assyria is modern day Iraq and Iran – in ancient times, it was the home of Nimrod the son of Ham. The one of the reads of the river pointed TOWARD Assyria but was not located in Assyria .  When you point toward something, you are outside of the thing you are pointing toward and not in it.

Example: The man is pointing toward the sea.  The man is not in the sea he is on the land or a place away from what he is pointing to.

“In the Bible and in later legends, Nimrod (Standard Hebrew נִמְרוֹד Nimrod, Tiberian Hebrew נִמְרֹד Nimrō), son of Cush , son of Ham, son of Noah, was a Mesopotamian monarch and "a mighty hunter before the Lord".  He is mentioned in the Table of Nations (Genesis 10), in the First Book of Chronicles, and in the Book of Micah. In the Bible he is an obscure figure; in later interpretations, as recorded by Josephus and the rabbis who compiled the Midrash, he is the subject of innumerable legends.” “The most prominent of these was the story that he built the Tower of Babel .”

Keep reading and pray because some of this may be foreign to your ears!

Let us release ourselves from mental and spiritual slavery!

Later interpretations made Nimrod the builder of the Tower of Babel and put him in opposition to God. We will look at the ‘later interpretations’ and the revisions that took place as the Bible was translated and transliterated into other languages. Later interpretations also made skin color and issue of ‘good and evil’ in the Bible.  Please, remember that God had kept the integrity of the Bible, but mankind has in his translations, transliterations and versions added his own prejudices in their later interpretations.

The Fourth River :

“And the fourth is the Euphrates .” 

Why didn’t they mention the Tigris ? Did it not exist? Was the Euphrates just one River in time past or is there another reason?

The Euphrates River is in what is now called the Middle East and in the mid-centuries was called Mesopotamia . This is the land of the Biblical Nimrod. However, we must ask the question middle of the East of what?  Africa .  The ancient Euphrates was also called the Narhariym.

“MESO-potamia - is certainly not an ancient word it means the middle of the two Rivers ' Tigris and Euphrates ' but original name is NAHARAIYM.”

Aram Narhariym - meaning ' Syria of the two rivers', this refers to the land between the Tigris and the Euphrates rivers in modern Iraq . Abraham sent his servant Eliezer to Aram Narhariym to find a wife for his son Isaac (Genesis 24:10). It was also the birthplace of Balaam, hired by the Moabite king Balak to curse the Israelites. Balaam came from Pethor in Aram Naharayim (Numbers 23:7; Deuteronomy 23:5).

Now here is the kicker:

“Another word is used that the 'Concordance people' overlooked, but related to the same word is Nahar (#5204) from the same root of # 5202 - a stream (including the SEA); especially the NILE, (or) Euphrates, etc): figuratively - prosperity - Flood River.”

Is the deletion of the Tigris in the Biblical account actually speaking of ONE large river in another place than Iraq ? The Nile leads to a city in the Bible called On or Anu and in Greek Heliopolis or the city of the Sun.  Joseph the married the daughter of the Priest of On and had two children by her Ephraim and Manasseh.  The Nahar [River] Narhariym are the children of the Nile, it was only later that it was called Mesopotamia to make those reading believe the River was in the Middle East .

The great Rivers and its four heads was and is in Africa . This should be the initial understanding to all who open the pages of the Bible, when you realize that ALL of Eden and its garden are located in Africa then you will also understand the point that will be made below.  Once the location is set then you will begin to see the truth of the Bible. 

Ask yourself:  Would God set a people without a high degree of melanin in this land?  In other words, would people with light skin be placed in a land or garden without the protection they need to survive?

Here is an excerpt from and article by the Cancer Association:

“Those with blond hair or light skin types have less melanin than darker individuals and thus burn more easily - and have a much higher risk of skin damage and cancer.  Blacks have a lot of melanin, are therefore dark-skinned, and their risk of getting skin cancers are much less than Whites.”

God in all of his wisdom did not put a light-skinned Adam in a climate that would cause him harm.

Recreation of bones of Ancient Israelite Eve

She looks like your Granny...huh!

The Importance of Melanin:

“Melanin is a molecule, but a very large complicated and complex living molecule. It has a very high molecular weight of over 200, meaning that one molecule of melanin is composed of a three dimensional configuration of over 200 individual atoms. It is a living molecule, a life chemical, and it is charged like a battery. In fact, it operates like a battery or super-conductor, yet it is heat-resistant and is characterized by a nice, sweet fragrance.

What and where is this compound found?

“This is because Melanin is found not only in the skin, hair, and eyes, but it is also contained in many other vital organs of the body as well. It is in the nervous system, the spinal cord, the glands, the brain, the DNA, the muscles, intestines, heart and liver. Its presence can be found throughout nature and is also found in many of our foods – plants, seeds, fruits, and vegetables. It is also found in animals, in the soil, in the bark of trees, rivers, streams, and seas.”

Wow, melanin is found in the soil – the earth, the dust of the ground?   Let’s think about this for a moment. Would God, who formed Adam from the black soil filled with melanin, make Adam other than black?  Let us look for some clues using the method that the Hebrew scholars used.

The Hebrew speaks of four ways to interpret the scriptures called PaDReS and acronym for:

Pshat: simple, plain, intended meaning (the opposite of Drash).

Remez: alluded meaning (reading between the lines). Remez in modern Hebrew means hint.

Drash: drawn out meaning. Homiletical or interpretative meaning. Not Pshat.

Sod: (lit. secret). The mystical [mystery] or esoteric meaning.

Here in the second chapter of Genesis we should look at the literal meaning or Pshat in locating Eden and its garden.  From that picture, we will begin to understand the African meaning of the location of the scriptures. If we are seekers of truth, then we should not have a problem understanding the concept of the earthen man [melanin] that God formed from the dust of the ground [melanin] was an African man made in Africa . 

To further enhance this point, we need to go to the Hebrew language itself. The Hebrew name for this man is Adam – formed from the land/earth.  The Hebrew word for that land he was formed from is Adamah. The word Dam that is a derivative of Adam and Adamah means BLOOD.  

“So, we can say and understand that from the blood of the earth God formed the first man.  Or, from the Dam of the Adamah God formed Adam.”

Then to widen our understanding, the melanin man formed the melanin rich earth was formed by God and he breathed life into him and placed him back on the African soil.  What we just did was called a “Remetz” which is reading between the lines.  This ‘Jewel of Wisdom” is found in his name and location and is a hint of what the TRUTH is. The first family of man was black placed in a black land filled with all they would need to live. In telling a narrative without understanding the location, culture, manner and mores of the story, leaves holes in the account and over time makes the story seem accurate. When science then meets up with Biblical truth then with the re-told inaccuracies, the Bible is looked at as a fraud. 

It is not a fraud - it was just interpreted, translated and transliterated leaving the truth of the African and Africa out of the picture. Why?  Well, we will get into that as we go on.

Ramses and the modern Watusi of Rwanda

The curls on the carving symbolizes our nappy hair!

 Tutsi men were said to be from the Aaronic Priesthood

God in all of His wisdom has given us a brain.  That brain functions at its highest level when given information that is compatible with the truth.  Given information interpreted correctly and to His glory, we will flesh out the Biblical narratives He has given to us.  When we fact an obstacle the brain, the truth can never be hidden under a basket; the light will shine in darkness. 

When you tell the story of your life, it would be necessary to inform the readers where you were born.  This is usually done somewhere in the opening paragraphs of your narrative.  Here are some Biblical examples of interpretation:

“And a River went out of Eden to water the garden: and from there it was parted and became four heads.” Gen. 2: 10.

“A river rises in Eden to water the garden; beyond there it divides and becomes four branches.

“And a river went out of the place of pleasure to water paradise, which from thence is divided into four heads.”

The second chapter of Genesis gives us the location for the introduction and addition of man into the scene.

In the case of the New Testament accounts of the life and lineage of Jesus is the first point. Why, because the location and people were already established in the Old Testament.  We see they refer back to the Old Testament knowledge by naming Abraham.  By adding Abraham, it not only gives us a point of location [ Ur of the Chaldea and later Harran ] but it tells us to look at who Abraham was historically.

The writers of Genesis did not just put these genealogical names in the Bible for us to over-look [which we have] he wanted us to know who the people were and were they came from based upon his entire word from Genesis to Revelations. The precedent was set in Genesis 2.

Nubian Woman from the line of Jesus

Also from the poeple that birthed Anwar Sadat.

It is interesting that the narrative in Matthew is started with Jesus being the son of David and then Abraham.   It gives us a clue to look at the genealogy of David and of Abraham. Son can be used in man ways, as humanity or mankind or even a initiation title.

“ The book of the generation of Jesus the Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. Matt 1:1.

We can also as an example, look at a modern take on this theme.

“…I was born in the Southside of Chicago, my mother and father was sharecroppers from Mississippi .”

Each account gives you a general historical account so you will not have to guess at the location or the peoples. We know that Chicago is located in the Northwestern part of what is now the United States of America .  Chicago was the destination point of the black migration from the time of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1865 to the advent of indenturing poor people for sharecropping in 1939. 

Mississippi is located in the southern part of the United States and was one of the poorest states in the union for poor black folks, although it has the riches land for growing crops.  Mississippi boasted that ‘Cotton was King’ of the delta.  Here is an excerpt from the American Experience as documentary aired on PBS.

“Although blacks outnumbered whites, the sharecropping system that replaced slavery helped ensure they remained poor and virtually locked out of any opportunity for land ownership or basic human rights. The system grew from the struggle between planters and ex-slaves on how to organize production. Planters wanted gang labor, as they had used under slavery, to work the fields; freed people wanted to own and work their own land.”

What we know from history:

"We'd get $12 per bale and we had to pick hard in order to have money to buy food during that season," said Mississippi State Senator David Jordan, whose parents were sharecroppers. "If we had a rainy week where we couldn't pick at all, then we would have no money. We would have to go get food and substances on credit."

At the end of the year, sharecroppers settled accounts by paying what they owed from any earnings made in the field. Since the plantation owners kept track of the calculations, rarely would sharecroppers see a profit.

"Some came out in the hole five or six times and they never did get out of the hole," Jordan said. "So what happened, they caught the midnight train or bus and headed to Chicago and they never found 'em, 'cause that was the only way to get out of that miserable situation."

Northern Migration:

Between 1910 and 1970, six and a half million blacks went North, leaving the South, the cotton fields, and sharecropping behind. By the end of World War II, much of cotton farming had been mechanized, and sharecroppers were thrown off the land. Some five million blacks left after 1940, creating the second great migration to the North. In Chicago , which had a direct train route from Mississippi , the black-owned newspaper The Chicago Defender urged blacks to migrate, and lobbied railroads to offer group rates for travelers. Black porters working on the trains distributed The Defender onboard.

We can then deduce that the writer of this story was born after slavery, his mother and father were workers on a farm that used to be a plantation, and those who use to be their masters kept them in continual poverty.

[Black sharecroppers are shown here picking cotton under the watchful eye of a white man on a horse, perhaps their former owner.]

So from the simple line:

“…I was born in the Southside of Chicago, my mother and father was sharecroppers from Mississippi .”

You can understand the whole history of not only the writer but of the nation in chaos. The same with the pages of the Bible…is why we are implored to “Study to show ourselves approved…a workman needing not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.”  That division is a dissecting the word so we may be able to put flesh on what we read.

The name great River in question was probably known to the first writer of the Testament but somehow through time that name was deleted  When faced with a problem about culture they would then refer back to the location information that was supplied to them in order to have a greater contextual understand.

For example: If you were from New Orleans, I would then understand your  loving references to Shrimp and Grits, Gumbo or your emotional response when discussing  about Hurricane Katrina and its affect on the 9th Ward.  I would assume you are African-American, Creole, Cajun or possibly Latino [which includes those of African descent] based upon the demographics of New Orleans , but definitely based in the poorer neighborhood.   The population of that city was 1.2 million there are 67% blacks and 28% white. Understand the population makeup in that location puts your story into context.

So what was the genealogy of King David?

He was the seventh son of Jesse.  He was a sheepherder and looked down upon by his brothers.  He did not have the same mother as his older brothers.  The Bible does not give the name of David’s mother but extra-Biblical evidence say she was African. We will go into the lineage of Abraham as the essay continues but first it is important to see why all these changes took place.

Black Power

It is important to discuss power and how it was [and is] used in history.  Power exerted on the pages of history can make a lie into the truth and that same power can write you in or out of the pages of history.

The Bible puts it best in Luke 20:46-47:

Beware of the scribes, which desire to walk in long robes, and love greetings in the markets, and the highest seats in the synagogues, and the chief rooms at feasts; who devour widows' houses, and for a pretense make long prayers: these will receive greater condemnation."

Proverbs 6:16-19 says:

“These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, a false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.”

That refers to a scribe of those who would chronicle history.  They lie to their generations and generations to come. How can a lie be told that others generations will believe as the truth?

Never told a lie?

Well, let us look at George Washington the so-called Father of this Nation.  He was said to be an upright man – and not lie was found in his mouth. We learned the story as a child he cut down a cherry tree and when asked by his parents who did the deed.  He was said to have been honest and confessed immediately to the crime.  His truthful reputation precedes any story about the first president of the United States .  However, that story was a lie. It was told to give Mr. Washington an aura of godliness. Those in political power who hold sway over our history contrived it.  

“Note and quote: “As far as we know, no. In fact, Washington 's biographer, Mason Weems, wrote a book called "The Life of Washington" shortly after his death where he created this myth as a way to show Washington 's honesty.”

Another example is Honest Abraham Lincoln who made it possible that the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 freed the slaves in America . He was said to be a friend of the slave and held us in esteem as equal to all me.  That was a lie too.  He has stated in his address that he could ‘care less’ about the Negro in slavery, his main concern was to save the union, this was also a lie.  Mr. Lincoln’s main concern was to spread the wealth of the southern region in order for all of America to reap the benefits that slavery wrought. 

Notes and quotes: In the debate at Charleston , Illinois , Lincoln stated:

"Judge Douglas has said to you that he has not been able to get from me an answer to the question whether I am in favor of Negro citizenship. . . . I tell him very frankly that I am not in favor of Negro citizenship" (p. 305).

Abe Lincoln and other in power did not balk when slave ships still delivered African slaves to the shores of the Carolinas and Louisiana up until 1906!

“Again, during the Douglas debates, Lincoln famously remarked: "There is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race" (p. 208).

When we heard the name or saw the image of George Washington or Abe Lincoln, we naturally believed what we were told.  We did not question the myth that was attached to them.  We saw it in black and white, we heard the stories all our lives and we accepted them without question.

Proverbs 11:1 says:

“A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight is his delight.”

Proverbs 20:23 says the same:

“The LORD detests differing weights, and dishonest scales do not please him.”

On study and examination here the writer or Proverbs.  The unjust weight or differing weights and scales is a symbol of the word of God itself.  This Proverb is repeated twice first in Proverbs 11:1 and then in Proverbs 20:23. We must always head God when he repeats himself!

An unjust weight undermines the dependence and reliability of the word [scale] by the people - not only for this generation and for generations to come if it is not CORRECTED.   Just as the unjust or lying scribe who is given the duty to record the scriptures correctly and interpret them correctly to the people. Why is their honestly so important? Because after a few generations in using the unjust measurement will carry more weight than t the original truth and the whole generation will behave in a corrupt commerce.

What did Jesus say to the scribe in a positive manner?

“And the scribe said to him ‘Well Master, thou has said the truth: for there is one God: ‘and there is no other but he; and when Jesus saw that he [the scribe] answered discreetly [prudent, tactful, subtle], he said to him “Thou are not far from the kingdom of God .” Mark 13:32-34.

What did he say to those scribes who were false speakers and lead the people astray with a false scale?

“O ye serpents [who used subtle changes] and generation of vipers how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Where fore I sent you prophets and wise men and scribes [his truth-tellers] and some of them you shall kill and crucify…” Matt 23: 33-34.

The power the Scribes had been incredible.  This power was transferred to those who later translated, transliterated and revised the scriptures over the course of 2500 years.

That is power! To create a reality that is contrary to the truth and make everyone believe it is true.  The dictionary definition of Power is authority, control, influence, supremacy, rule, command, sway, muscle, dominance and strength.

“True Power is the ability to impose your reality on others and make them accept it without question.”

Although God is the source of all power – there are principalities and power ruler of darkness in high and lofty places that are constantly at work to change the fabric of the world, to change the original into a counterfeit.  He has left us our brains to figure out what is true.  He has given his commandments and the Holy Spirit to discern good from evil, but we do not use the greatest computer in the world – our brain.  We just accept the story without question. We submit to error and this is the Spirit of Anti-Christ.

The Devil and the Anti-Christ

In a deep study, we see the term ‘Anti-Christ’ is not just someone that opposed to Christ, it is actually those who come alongside the truth in order to replace Christ in our lives and replace the truth [Emet] with a lie.  It is like riding a horse and then another horse comes along of you and subtly coaxes you to change your seating by riding so close to make you think he is the same horse. Soon you will be on another horse going in another direction without being aware of the change, then you will teach you children the lie you learned and so on and so on.  The false ride will seem the same until you get to the wrong destination.

How did this falsehood start?  With the one who always makes subtle changes in our lives.

“And the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made.” Gen. 3:1.

What is the definition of subtle?

ü      So slight as to be difficult to detect or describe; elusive.

ü      Difficult to understand; like a subtle point.

ü      Characterized by skill or ingenuity; clever.

ü      Crafty or sly; devious. 

ü      Operating in a hidden, usually injurious way; insidious: a subtle poison.

The adversary was adept at making small adjustments in the minds of Adam and Eve. Just as a small rip in a bed sheet can mean disaster.  If that rip is not repaired, it will eventually make a large hole and soon the sheet is worthless. Therefore, are the small subtle lies that we have allowed to set up in our minds concerning ourselves and our role in Biblical events.

Those subtle lies have caused us to read the Bible based in another culture and vision. Without careful study our answers, analysis and commentaries are not approved unto God.  In eternity, we will stand before him ashamed because of our inability to rightly divide the word of truth.  If we miss such a simple thing in Genesis 2, then what else will we miss?  If this information was subtly changed then what else was changed and why?  Was it to eliminate the son and daughters of God and to change the truth into a lie?

How does this subtle change start?   Simply, as the Bible says:

"Take us the foxes, the little foxes that spoil the vines: for our vines have tender grapes.”  Song of Solomon 2:15.  

A small deed can render a tremendous consequence over time. The tactic of the Devil is simple, he confuses the information that we have received from God and call in question the evidence placed before us.

Let us read Genesis again this time armed with the Biblical information necessary to understand the location of Eden .

“And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from there [the garden] it was parted, and became four heads.  The name of the first is Pison: that is it, which compasses the whole land of Havilah [son of Cush ], where there is gold; and the gold of that land is good; there is bdellium and the onyx stone. And the name of the second river is Gihon [Nile] the same that encompasses the land of Ethiopia [ Africa ]. The third river is the Hiddekel; that is which goes toward [not in Assyria, but pointing towards] the east of Assyria . And the fourth is the Euphrates [the home of Nimrod]. Genesis 2:10-14.

Using these coordinates you see that Eden and its garden was in Africa and the bases of all Biblical stories exclusively involved African people. 

 

Let the Rocks Cry Out…

Archeology and history has proven that the first people who walked the earth were African. Bones, paintings, objects and artifacts are unearthed every day and the conclusion is the same, Mankind sprang from Africa . Africa as we see it today is a shadow of its original land mass. Africa or the land of the Blacks extended from western China , Africa, Israel the Middle East, India , Australia , New Zealand and the Islands of the sea. The geographical outline of Africa today has been chipped away and sectioned off to create the illusion of a smaller continent and disenfranchise those of African descent in the countries mentioned above. What we know about Israel was that it was a part of Africa before Africa was carved up into a section that separated it from the so-called Middle East and the land that Nimrod inhabited.

“And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.

"He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD. And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel , and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar .”

The region that was inhabited by Shem was what was what is now known as Israel .  Here is a recreated picture of one of the first women found in the region of Israel called Eve.

As we have concluded, in order the study the Bible, you must first understand the location, culture and language in which it was originally written, not the culture and language in which it was copied.

To study a heavily copied material is like trying to find out who my grandmother is by asking the grocer in her neighborhood.  You may glean some useful information about her from him but - it is not first hand information. It may have a form of truth, but the grocer has only related to your grandmother in a particular way he could not give a complete assessment of her personality or specific description.   By speaking to him, a person who only saw her occasionally, and one who did not love her or have the same blood as she did, you would get a strangers view of your Grandmother. 

Later generations who did not know here and who only had the grocers account would have a limited understanding of this great lady.  A copied copy is vague in its information. You have to go back in order to understand it essence. A copied copy will only give you the outline of the truth.

Watch what happens in just two generations

 

The copy

The copy of the copy

It has been 2000 years since the actions of the New Testament and 3500 years since the actions of the Old Testament. There are copies after copies after copies made in at least 25 languages before King James commissioned his workers to translate and transliterate the word into his own VERSION.  As we can see, the truth can be whitewashed.

Power is the ability to make your own reality, then impose it on others, and have them accept it as the truth or standard. 

 

 

A Change in Mindset

Hu are You?

We have been convinced over the years that the only way the black man knew, understood salvation or inherited was through European colonization and slavery.  We accepted that mind-set by those exerted power over us.  We were given a new reality, and the paradigm was changed. First, let us look at what happened to us in Slavery and Colonialism to break our people down low enough to accept this lie.   

“Colonialism is a system in which a state [land or people] claims sovereignty over territory and people outside its own boundaries, often to facilitate economic domination over their resources, labor, and often markets. The term also refers to a set of beliefs used to legitimize or promote this system, especially the belief that the mores of the colonizer are superior to those of the colonized.” Encyclopedia Britannica 1993.

Colonialism meant the control of our native lands and culture for the exploitation of the natural resources, history and people.  It was established to make us believe they or colonizers were superior.   The first emissary of Colonialism was the explorer and then the missionary. Although some missionaries and religious leaders of Europe American were abolitionist, many were also being used to make inroads to Africa to find and exploit the African gold and diamond mines, fertile lands and eventually enslave the people. [See the books entitled White Man’s Burden and the Heart of Darkness]. Sadly, the first of the slave ships bond for America had Biblical names like the good ship Jesus.  The places where the slaves were held boasted of Sunday services and rousing sermons preached before the voyage.

In the book the Heart of Darkness:

“Heart of Darkness is also a multilayered postcolonial parable. And it is a story in which racism presents itself so blatantly that, for many, the dilemma of race must be tackled before anything else in the book may be dealt with. Conrad's liberal use of derogatory, outdated and offensive terminology and the flagrant devaluation of people of color as savages, niggers and cannibals -- this use of language by Conrad darken and disturb many a contemporary, 1996 mind.”

Early slave trade-- European aristocrats used African slaves as a symbol of status. Blacks were seen as a mere curiosity.  But doctrines concerning how human physiological differences emerged in regards to Adam and Eve.  Since Europeans believed that Adam and Eve were "white", they began formulating why the appearance of blacks was so different. Monogenists believed that the races arose as a result of the degeneration of human beings since creation. 

“Most [Christian] missionaries were rather naive and idealistic, and really wanted to help the Africans, although they were very paternalistic and condescending about it. But tales of their adventures, and those of explorers like Dr. Stanley Livingston, helped spark a general Western fascination with Africa, and after 1880s, and this translated into first economic and then political domination. Dr. Livingston was a missionary for hire – who worked to map Africa for the blood thirsty European King Leopold.”

The map of Africa was re-drawn without any regard to actual ethnic groups, languages, or even geographical borders, but the territories carved out by Europeans ultimately became many of the new African nations after W.W.II. People finding themselves under the authority of a